“Not-so-smart meters” – What Doctors Don’t Tell You magazine exposes Smart Meter threats

WDDTY

Our thanks go to What Doctors Don’t Tell You magazine and columnist Guy Hudson for their excellent article this month on the dangers of Smart Meters.

You can pick up a copy of the magazine – published monthly – in WH Smiths, or subscribe at www.wddty.com.

To download & read the article (from this month’s May 2014 edition), click here – Not-so-Smart Meters – WDDTY.

6 Comments
  1. Is there any sober “debate” regarding the intentional extermination of our species? Answer: No. Only the pointing of fingers and denial of complicity.

    Physicians gather the results of thousands of EM emissions studies, and the press blocks any public comment. The World Health Organization piddles around with studying emissions reductions, whilst the United Nations implements it’s own Agenda 21 extermination program. Millions of people peruse the EM “sensitivity” web sites using wireless iPads, whilst their children are sterilized and tortured in wi-fi equipped schools. Federal agencies allow breaking and entering into private property to install “smart” technology against citizen protest, and detain citizens for resisting their own extermination. Petitions abound everywhere, and end up in State and municipal round files. Industrial ghouls and blood suckers pander and faun about their next new widget, then drop dead from pancreatic cancer.

    Anyone who has been watching this morbid circus with any intensity knows the end game is total extermination of all life on the planet. Keep pointing fingers at one another in your corporate/capitalist/mafia hall of mirrors.

    http://www.saferemr.com/2013/12/cellphone-radiation-safety-in-2013-year.html

    More meditation on the depth of the fuzzy electromagnetic naval:

    LTE Cell Phone Radiation Affects Brain Activity in Cell Phone Users
    Oct 24, 2013
    Your Cell Phone Company May Affect Your Risk of Brain Cancer
    Mar 27, 2013
    Most Significant Government Health Report on Mobile Phone Radiation Ever Published
    Apr 24, 2013
    Cell Phone Use, Acoustic Neuroma and Cancer of the Pituitary Gland
    May 10, 2013
    FCC Needs Input about Radio-Frequency Radiation
    Jul 19, 2013
    Wireless Industry’s Patented System to Reduce Cancer Risk from Wireless Local Networks Never Adopted
    Mar 11, 2013
    WHO Monograph on Cancer Risk from Mobile Phone Use Released
    Apr 19, 2013
    Call for Action to Reduce Harm from Mobile PhoneRadiation
    Jan 23, 2013
    Children’s Cell Phone Use May Increase Their Risk of ADHD
    Apr 2, 2013
    Brain Cancer Risk Increases with the Amount of Wireless Phone Use: Study
    Sep 25, 2013
    Did Tom Wheeler, Nominee for FCC Chair, Subvert Research Showing Harm From Cell Phone Radiation?
    May 28, 2013

    Cellphones and Health
    Nov 3, 2013
    Everything You Wanted to Know about Cell Phone Radiation:An Index of FCC Submissions
    Nov 20, 2013
    Opposition to the Los Angeles Public Schools Wi-Fi Policy
    Mar 25, 2013
    American Academy of Pediatrics Demands FCC Protect Children from Cell Phone and Wireless Radiation
    Sep 12, 2013
    French Health Agency Recommends Children and Vulnerable Groups Reduce Cell Phone Radiation Exposure
    Oct 15, 2013
    MOBI-KIDS: Childhood Brain Tumor Risk & Mobile Phone Use Study
    May 10, 2013
    Experts Adopt Two Resolutions about Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation
    Apr 18, 2013
    World Health Organization Monograph on Cancer Risk from Mobile Phone Use Released
    Apr 19, 2013

  2. Is there not a new study into the effects of this radiation now to take place by government and industry in the uk? I understand it is to investigate the effects on children and is to last three years.

    • Hi David,

      You might be referring to the SCAMP study. If so, it is unlikely to find any harm from mobile phones – not least because its methodology is too wide. It is being funded by the government and mobile phone operators. It sits under the Research Initiative on Health and Mobile Telecommunications (RIHMT) – formerly the MTHR. MHTR has never found a problem with EM exposure, despite there being thousands of studies to the contrary.

      More here: http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resonance-beings-of-frequency-full-documentary/

      • Plus, according to Dr Klinghardt, it takes about four years for negative health results to start showing up, so a three year study is not long enough.

        • Hi Tanya,

          Keep in mind that Dr. Klinghardt is refering to cellular phone emissions studies that are now outdated by the newer G4 (and planned) G5 broadcast frequencies. These newer high frequency emissions will prove to be much more biologically destructive than the older G3 systems. So that’s something to look forward to!!!

          Also notice that many hundreds of thousands of persons are reporting immediate harmful effects from “smart” meters installed in or near their homes. Some react within hours, and many can no longer live in their own homes.

          Governmental agencies will do nothing to stop these smart meter and cellular tower installations, because all government employees are on the corporate dole and have no clue about anything outside of shuffling paper and collecting a paycheck for sucking the corporate tit.

          If you want to be rid of all this cell tower and wi-fi carnage, you’ll have to tear the towers down yourselves.

  3. For readers who “just don’t get it” there’s a perfectly straight forward to way to understand why corporate/political organizations and governments are making all the wrong decisions regarding electromagnetic health: This is a good image set for displaying how the body is totally immersed and surrounded in these damaging pulsed EM fields. Scroll down the page for different images at different density ranges. >

    http://www.mydeals.com/blog/what-if-you-could-see-wifi/post

    Then click this link > http://www.antennasearch.com/

    Plug in an address like 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC.
    There are (as of May 15, 2014) 93 towers within a 1 mile radius of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20006. That’s right, 93 tower installations (with only 11 registered and 82 as unregistered). The FCC will not publish these unregistered broadcast frequencies nor the combined power of the broadcast totals. Why not?

    As if that were not bad enough, there are 598 RF emissions antenna within 1 mile radius of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20006. There is no way human beings can function normally under the influence of these excessive EM and pulsed RF emissions.

    Run the same antenna search process in any major government legislative center in any modern city, and the results will tell the legend of the tale. In my opinion, our executive class has become functionally insane and terminal due to these emissions.

    Inspiring government agencies to initiate a full shut down of these emissions is about as functional as buggering a whore to inspire virginity.